John Innes (oh no, not again!!)

For the discussion of topics related to the conservation, cultivation, propagation and exhibition of cacti & other succulents.
Forum rules
For the discussion of topics related to the conservation, cultivation, propagation, exhibition & science of cacti & other succulents only.

Please respect all forum members opinions and if you can't make a civil reply, don't reply!
User avatar
Phil_SK
Moderator
Posts: 5448
https://www.behance.net/kuchnie-warszawa
Joined: 11 Jan 2007
Branch: MACCLESFIELD & EAST CHESHIRE
Country: UK
Role within the BCSS: Forum Moderator
Location: Stockport, UK

Re: John Innes (oh no, not again!!)

Post by Phil_SK »

Do you not think it's odd to list the thing you're making as an ingredient of the thing you're making?
Phil Crewe, BCSS 38143. Mostly S. American cacti, esp. Lobivia, Sulcorebutia and little Opuntia
User avatar
Jim_Mercer
BCSS Member
Posts: 2240
Joined: 24 Feb 2011
Branch: LIVERPOOL
Country: UK
Role within the BCSS: Member
Location: Liverpool
Contact:

Re: John Innes (oh no, not again!!)

Post by Jim_Mercer »

Phil_SK wrote:Do you not think it's odd to list the thing you're making as an ingredient of the thing you're making?
Two different things JI compost and JI base fertiliser and the second is required to make the first

http://www.johninnes.info/jibase.htm

http://www.gardendirect.co.uk/garden-ca ... innes-base
User avatar
iann
BCSS Member
Posts: 14565
Joined: 11 Jan 2007
Branch: MACCLESFIELD & EAST CHESHIRE
Country: UK
Role within the BCSS: Member

Re: John Innes (oh no, not again!!)

Post by iann »

Nobody refers to the base fertiliser as "JI". Except maybe a label writer :) It would be fascinating to run a proper composition check on this stuff. I'm not going to buy any, but it is simple enough to shake some up in a jar and see how much floats. You might be surprised.
Cheshire, UK
User avatar
DaveW
BCSS Member
Posts: 8168
Joined: 08 Jul 2007
Branch: NOTTINGHAM
Country: UK
Role within the BCSS: Branch President
Location: Nottingham

Re: John Innes (oh no, not again!!)

Post by DaveW »

I agree with Ian, the traditional John Innes composts are a set formula. If you deviate from this you should not be calling them JI composts. That is simply a marketing ploy to ride on the back of the traditional JI name rather than admitting you are producing something totally different.

Neither can you have this ridiculous stuff called "peat free JI compost" since peat and loam are integral parts of the formula. Also it has to be made with sphagnum moss peat, not sedge peat.

Here is the history of JI composts:-

http://gardenofeaden.blogspot.co.uk/201 ... mpost.html

The base fertiliser made to the John Innes Institutes formula is referred to as "John Innes Base Fertiliser" though:-

"John Innes Base Fertiliser is the name coined at the John Innes Research Institute in the 1930's for a ready mixed blend of hoof and horn, superphosphate and potassium sulphate for mixing with loam, peat and grit to make John Innes Loam-based Potting Composts."
Nottingham Branch BCSS. Joined the then NCSS in 1961, Membership number 11944. Cactus only collection.
User avatar
iann
BCSS Member
Posts: 14565
Joined: 11 Jan 2007
Branch: MACCLESFIELD & EAST CHESHIRE
Country: UK
Role within the BCSS: Member

Re: John Innes (oh no, not again!!)

Post by iann »

I suspect the majority of big-brand JI mixes use a modern "alternate JI base" rather than something made from hoof and horn. I don't know that for sure though. Picked up another bag of Singleton JI#2 today. Haven't opened it yet, but hopefully it continues to be the real deal: that is mostly loam :)
Cheshire, UK
User avatar
DaveW
BCSS Member
Posts: 8168
Joined: 08 Jul 2007
Branch: NOTTINGHAM
Country: UK
Role within the BCSS: Branch President
Location: Nottingham

Re: John Innes (oh no, not again!!)

Post by DaveW »

Nottingham Branch BCSS. Joined the then NCSS in 1961, Membership number 11944. Cactus only collection.
User avatar
iann
BCSS Member
Posts: 14565
Joined: 11 Jan 2007
Branch: MACCLESFIELD & EAST CHESHIRE
Country: UK
Role within the BCSS: Member

Re: John Innes (oh no, not again!!)

Post by iann »

The 5/7/10-ish formulations are almost certainly the original JI base formula with hoof'n'horn. One of them even says to keep away from livestock. The modern chemical JI base is slightly different, here's an example:
http://www.gardendirect.co.uk/garden-ca ... e-improved
Cheshire, UK
Post Reply