I recently bought this plant in a garden center; it was labelled Echeveia globulosa: obviosly an error.
Now, the plants is the one generally sold as Sedum hintonii, but certanly it is NOT that species.
It could be S. mocinianum or S. piaxtlaense.... : the stem and leaves resemble those of S. mocinianum, in my opinion, but the flowering stem correspond to that of S. piaxtlaense.....
Have you any comment?
Sedum mocinianum / piaxtlaense
Forum rules
For the discussion of topics related to the conservation, cultivation, propagation, exhibition & science of cacti & other succulents only.
Please respect all forum members opinions and if you can't make a civil reply, don't reply!
For the discussion of topics related to the conservation, cultivation, propagation, exhibition & science of cacti & other succulents only.
Please respect all forum members opinions and if you can't make a civil reply, don't reply!
-
Roberto A
- BCSS Member
- Posts: 95
- https://www.behance.net/kuchnie-warszawa
- Joined: 17 Jan 2010
Sedum mocinianum / piaxtlaense
- Attachments
-
-
-
Liz M
- BCSS Member
- Posts: 3018
- Joined: 22 Dec 2007
- Branch: MACCLESFIELD & EAST CHESHIRE
- Country: United Kingdom
- Role within the BCSS: Trustee
- Location: The North West of England
- Contact:
Re: Sedum mocinianum / piaxtlaense
This is Sedum paixtlaense, its flowers and flower stems are noticeably different from Sedum mocinianum. A very nice plant, too.
Obsessive Crassulaceae lover, especially Aeoniums but also grow, Aloes, Agaves, Haworthias and a select number of Cacti.
Re: Sedum mocinianum / piaxtlaense
.. but I am doubtful about it being S. piaxtalaense as the original description says: <<rosette: lax>>; on the other hand, it says <<rosette: dense>> about S. mocinianum......Liz M wrote:This is Sedum paixtlaense, its flowers and flower stems are noticeably different from Sedum mocinianum. A very nice plant, too.
Does not seem to you that "my" plant has a very dense rosette???