Which Huernia?

For the discussion of topics related to the conservation, cultivation, propagation and exhibition of cacti & other succulents.
Forum rules
For the discussion of topics related to the conservation, cultivation, propagation, exhibition & science of cacti & other succulents only.

Please respect all forum members opinions and if you can't make a civil reply, don't reply!
User avatar
Diane
BCSS Member
Posts: 5575
https://www.behance.net/kuchnie-warszawa
Joined: 15 Jun 2007
Branch: None
Country: UK
Role within the BCSS: Member

Re: Which Huernia?

Post by Diane »

I agree with you, Mike. Huernia species can often have very variable flowers, which doesn't help!
Diane - member of Kingston branch

Growing cacti - balm to the soul!
User avatar
Stuart
BCSS Member
Posts: 1960
Joined: 11 Jan 2007
Branch: BRISTOL
Country: England

Re: Which Huernia?

Post by Stuart »

Looks like I had the wrong name on this one. It should be Sudanensis. It came from a reliable California source that normally is accurate with names but not with this one. Even the Phyto had the wrong name. It is the same plant that was described in the US Society's yearbook, Haseltonia a few years ago.

Stuart
User avatar
Diane
BCSS Member
Posts: 5575
Joined: 15 Jun 2007
Branch: None
Country: UK
Role within the BCSS: Member

Re: Which Huernia?

Post by Diane »

Stuart wrote: Wed Jan 16, 2019 5:05 pm Looks like I had the wrong name on this one. It should be Sudanensis. It came from a reliable California source that normally is accurate with names but not with this one. Even the Phyto had the wrong name. It is the same plant that was described in the US Society's yearbook, Haseltonia a few years ago.

Stuart
Ahaa...
Diane - member of Kingston branch

Growing cacti - balm to the soul!
User avatar
conolady
BCSS Member
Posts: 199
Joined: 15 Oct 2018
Branch: EXETER
Country: UK
Role within the BCSS: Member

Re: Which Huernia?

Post by conolady »

Stuart wrote: Wed Jan 16, 2019 5:05 pm Looks like I had the wrong name on this one. It should be Sudanensis. It came from a reliable California source that normally is accurate with names but not with this one. Even the Phyto had the wrong name. It is the same plant that was described in the US Society's yearbook, Haseltonia a few years ago.

Stuart
Great! Thanks, Stuart. Mystery solved!
First it was orchids, then, since c.2001, cacti and succulents. I'm into South African plants, mainly conos, lithops and haworthias, with a few cacti, especially 'posh' mamms, turbs and other smalls. Now it’s stapeliads as well...
Post Reply