ID please

For the discussion of topics related to the conservation, cultivation, propagation and exhibition of cacti & other succulents.
Forum rules
For the discussion of topics related to the conservation, cultivation, propagation, exhibition & science of cacti & other succulents only.

Please respect all forum members opinions and if you can't make a civil reply, don't reply!
Post Reply
Eric Williams
BCSS Member
Posts: 2321
https://www.behance.net/kuchnie-warszawa
Joined: 13 Feb 2009
Branch: SOUTH WALES
Country: UK

ID please

Post by Eric Williams »

I have obtained this plant. Only info given that it was a Trichocereus. with the species starting with "f" lol. It has a damaged growing point ,so I wondered what I could do with it. Thanks
image.jpeg
image.jpeg
. Some nice long spines too.
topsy
BCSS Trustee
Posts: 845
Joined: 20 Sep 2007
Branch: BRISTOL
Country: UK
Role within the BCSS: Life Members

Re: ID please

Post by topsy »

Hi,

With that relatively thin stem, for a Trichocereus, and those very long, strong spines I would think it might be T.fulvilanatus.

Suzanne
Mal L
BCSS Member
Posts: 355
Joined: 28 May 2011
Branch: MACCLESFIELD & EAST CHESHIRE
Country: UK
Role within the BCSS: Member
Location: UK

Re: ID please

Post by Mal L »

topsy wrote: Thu Jun 13, 2019 10:05 am Hi,

With that relatively thin stem, for a Trichocereus, and those very long, strong spines I would think it might be T.fulvilanatus.

Suzanne
I always thought that the proper spelling was T. fulvilanus, but I notice that when you google T. fulvilanatus you see references to what seems to be the same plant. However, I though that "lanatus" meant wooly, which this plant is clearly not, so I am not convinced that the latter is correct. Am I right?
Malcolm
Stockport, UK
Member of Macclesfield & East Cheshire BCSS Branch

Collection mainly of cacti, though interested in a much wider variety of plants than I can accommodate!
User avatar
Tony R
Moderator
Posts: 4014
Joined: 20 Apr 2009
Branch: CAMBRIDGE
Country: UK
Role within the BCSS: Member
Location: Hartley, LONGFIELD, Kent

Re: ID please

Post by Tony R »

Mal L wrote: Thu Jun 13, 2019 12:09 pm
topsy wrote: Thu Jun 13, 2019 10:05 am Hi,

With that relatively thin stem, for a Trichocereus, and those very long, strong spines I would think it might be T.fulvilanatus.

Suzanne
I always thought that the proper spelling was T. fulvilanus, but I notice that when you google T. fulvilanatus you see references to what seems to be the same plant. However, I though that "lanatus" meant wooly, which this plant is clearly not, so I am not convinced that the latter is correct. Am I right?
Indeed, Mal:
Image1.jpg
Tony Roberts
Treasurer, Haworthia Society
Chairman, Tephrocactus Study Group
Moderator, BCSS Forum
Kent
(Gasteria, Mammillaria, small Opuntia, Cleistocactus and Sempervivum are my current special interests)
User avatar
RAYWOODBRIDGE
BCSS Member
Posts: 1134
Joined: 10 Mar 2012
Branch: None
Country: United Kingdom
Role within the BCSS: Member
Location: North West England
Contact:

Re: ID please

Post by RAYWOODBRIDGE »

I've always called it Trichocereus deserticolus but that could just be me. :oops:
Ray

BCSS member 50155
DKG member 311605
Echinocereenfreund member 100

Cactus only collection mainly from seed.
Eric Williams
BCSS Member
Posts: 2321
Joined: 13 Feb 2009
Branch: SOUTH WALES
Country: UK

Re: ID please

Post by Eric Williams »

Thanks Topsy, that's it solved. Emailed the previous owner who admitted Topsy,s result had jogged his memory. As the growing point is damaged, I wonder if I will get any joy by giving it a repot, and some TLC. The spines are very nice, pity to chop it head off. Cheers
Post Reply