Gymnocalycium species question!!

For the discussion of topics related to the conservation, cultivation, propagation and exhibition of cacti & other succulents.
Forum rules
For the discussion of topics related to the conservation, cultivation, propagation, exhibition & science of cacti & other succulents only.

Please respect all forum members opinions and if you can't make a civil reply, don't reply!
Post Reply
Maria J
BCSS Member
Posts: 4313
https://www.behance.net/kuchnie-warszawa
Joined: 11 Jan 2007
Branch: SHREWSBURY
Country: UK
Role within the BCSS: Fellows
Location: Shropshire - UK
Contact:

Gymnocalycium species question!!

Post by Maria J »

I have recently acquired a gymnocalycium hybopleurum with a field no of B 44.
Having checked on Ralph Martin's site, this brings up G. Bicolour. I have had a look with Google but can't find if one is a synonym of the other!!
Is this in the NCL? Or can someone familiar with Gymnos help please??

Thanks very much! :)
Maria
Shrewsbury Branch - Shropshire UK
Joined BCSS April 06 (# 48776)

Tending more towards cacti :D, particularly Gymnocalyciums, Rebutias, Sulcorebutias, Echinopses, Thelos, Feros and Mamms (and anything else I like the look of!) all in an 8 x 6 polycarb greenhouse and a few windowsills!
User avatar
Lindsey
Registered Guest
Posts: 3302
Joined: 11 Jan 2007
Branch: None
Country: UK
Role within the BCSS: Non-Member
Location: Surrey, SE England

Re: Gymnocalycium species question!!

Post by Lindsey »

John Pilbeam's book says B44 = G.bicolor (no "u"!). Also, that the B numbers are Dorothea Muhr collection nos. One learns something every day :-)

Lindsey.
Ever hopeful, trying to grow plants from arid sunny climates in the UK!
Lithops, Haworthia, Adromischus, other south African succulents including Ceropegia and some Crassula.
Roy
BCSS Member
Posts: 1646
Joined: 11 Jan 2007
Branch: HULL
Country: United Kingdom
Role within the BCSS: Member
Contact:

Re: Gymnocalycium species question!!

Post by Roy »

NCL refers bicolor to mostii. I can't find hybopluerium mentioned in that book,
although I do recognise the name, but the are only listing their principle synonyms.
Member Bcss
User avatar
Chris43
BCSS Member
Posts: 2574
Joined: 11 Jan 2007
Branch: HIGH WYCOMBE
Country: United Kingdom
Role within the BCSS: Branch Vice Chair

Re: Gymnocalycium species question!!

Post by Chris43 »

According to this web site:
http://uc.privat.t-online.de/
G. hybopleurum is a synonym of G. mazanense.

I hope this helps.Mind you I'm not sure what the NCL says about mazanense!
Chris, Chinnor, Oxon, UK
Mammillaria enthusiast
BCSS High Wycombe Branch.
http://www.woodedge.me.uk/Home.html
Maria J
BCSS Member
Posts: 4313
Joined: 11 Jan 2007
Branch: SHREWSBURY
Country: UK
Role within the BCSS: Fellows
Location: Shropshire - UK
Contact:

Re: Gymnocalycium species question!!

Post by Maria J »

Thanks everyone; so far it seems that they are in contradiction! (The species & the field number I mean!)
I wonder which applies to my plant!!
Maria
Shrewsbury Branch - Shropshire UK
Joined BCSS April 06 (# 48776)

Tending more towards cacti :D, particularly Gymnocalyciums, Rebutias, Sulcorebutias, Echinopses, Thelos, Feros and Mamms (and anything else I like the look of!) all in an 8 x 6 polycarb greenhouse and a few windowsills!
Roy
BCSS Member
Posts: 1646
Joined: 11 Jan 2007
Branch: HULL
Country: United Kingdom
Role within the BCSS: Member
Contact:

Re: Gymnocalycium species question!!

Post by Roy »

Hi Chris,
it refers mazanense to hossei.
Member Bcss
User avatar
iann
BCSS Member
Posts: 14565
Joined: 11 Jan 2007
Branch: MACCLESFIELD & EAST CHESHIRE
Country: UK
Role within the BCSS: Member

Re: Gymnocalycium species question!!

Post by iann »

I think one thing we can all agree on is that G. hybopleurum and G. bicolor are not the same thing. G. bicolor seems fairly firmly placed in G. mostii. I think the NCL will show G. mazanense referred to something else, perhaps G. hossei. Strange that there is no mention of G. hybopleurum, I thought that was a fairly stable species, although possibly related to G. monvillei which has swept up a bunch of names in the past.

If you have a field collection number, it is certainly worth maintaining that, and probably worth maintaining the name that goes with it even if it isn't the current accepted taxonomical name. The species it is referred to today may change in the future and you'll be stuck if your label just says Gymnocalycium big-lumped-species-name.
Cheshire, UK
Post Reply