Lobivia 2383

For the discussion of topics related to the conservation, cultivation, propagation and exhibition of cacti & other succulents.
Forum rules
For the discussion of topics related to the conservation, cultivation, propagation, exhibition & science of cacti & other succulents only.

Please respect all forum members opinions and if you can't make a civil reply, don't reply!
Post Reply
The Tunn
BCSS Member
Posts: 110
https://www.behance.net/kuchnie-warszawa
Joined: 21 Aug 2013
Branch: None
Country: England
Location: Kent

Lobivia 2383

Post by The Tunn »

Pretty sure that I got this little chap from Ralph Martin earlier this year (messed up my spreadsheet and I'm not 100% certain)
Think it is now Lobivia cinnabarina LB 2383 from 30km West of Caneletas 2160m ? If Lobivia as such still exists.
Whatever it is I was really surprised at the size and colour of the flower, nothing to do with me as I've not had it long but I thought it may be of interest.
Lobivia 2383 b.JPG
Lobivia 2383 a.JPG
User avatar
Phil_SK
Moderator
Posts: 5450
Joined: 11 Jan 2007
Branch: MACCLESFIELD & EAST CHESHIRE
Country: UK
Role within the BCSS: Forum Moderator
Location: Stockport, UK

Re: Lobivia 2383

Post by Phil_SK »

Looks like cardenasiana to me.
Phil Crewe, BCSS 38143. Mostly S. American cacti, esp. Lobivia, Sulcorebutia and little Opuntia
User avatar
ralphrmartin
BCSS Research Committee Chairman
Posts: 6076
Joined: 11 Jan 2007
Branch: None
Country: United Kingdom
Role within the BCSS: Chairman - Research
Location: Pwllheli
Contact:

Re: Lobivia 2383

Post by ralphrmartin »

Yes, I don't have any L. cinnabarina (LB2383 or otherwise), so something has gone adrift I suspect.

Nice plant though.
Ralph Martin
https://www.rrm.me.uk/Cacti/cacti.html
Members visiting the Llyn Peninsula are welcome to visit my collection.

Swaps and sales at https://www.rrm.me.uk/Cacti/forsale.php

My Field Number Database is at https://www.fieldnos.bcss.org.uk
The Tunn
BCSS Member
Posts: 110
Joined: 21 Aug 2013
Branch: None
Country: England
Location: Kent

Re: Lobivia 2383

Post by The Tunn »

Thanks, Ralph and Phil. Wonder where I got it? May have been my last visit to cactus mart, not always sure who the seller is at those.

If it's of interest I found the name on here:

http://www.cl-cactus.com/fn.asp?FnID=82 ... 2179781745

But as Spike Milligan once said: "A rose by any other name would be a cabbage." Whatever it is and wherever it's from I like it!
User avatar
Phil_SK
Moderator
Posts: 5450
Joined: 11 Jan 2007
Branch: MACCLESFIELD & EAST CHESHIRE
Country: UK
Role within the BCSS: Forum Moderator
Location: Stockport, UK

Re: Lobivia 2383

Post by Phil_SK »

LB 2383 was listed for the last time in Ludwig's 2010-2011 list (published late 2010) as as unnamed species:
2383a.JPG
I only have one older list than this (for the year before) where, again, it is just 'sp.'
When collectors bring back seed from habitat there can often be changes in identification once a plant flowers (if there were ripe fruit on a plant there almost certainly wouldn't have been flowers). Perhaps his initial identification was cinnabarina (and this was passed on to Ralph's and Christophe's databases) but this was later revised in view of the flower.
I still reckon this is L. cardenasiana - the flower is quite distinctive - and looks to fit based on the location. Rausch, in his 1970s books has cinnabarina around Sucre.
2383b.JPG
2383b.JPG (17.39 KiB) Viewed 852 times
with cardenasiana further south, to the east of Tarija.
2383c.JPG
2383c.JPG (10.88 KiB) Viewed 852 times
The LB location, 30km west of Canaletas, is in the cardenasiana blob (Google thinks Canaletas is in a rather barren spot halfway up a mountain but I'm assuming it's not too far from here).
2383d.JPG
Finally, Tomasz Blaczkowski has it as "cardenasiana aff." on his website http://www.lobivia.pl/foto.html
Phil Crewe, BCSS 38143. Mostly S. American cacti, esp. Lobivia, Sulcorebutia and little Opuntia
The Tunn
BCSS Member
Posts: 110
Joined: 21 Aug 2013
Branch: None
Country: England
Location: Kent

Re: Lobivia 2383

Post by The Tunn »

Thanks, Phil for all your effort. That looks pretty conclusive; L. cardenasiana it is. Label will be amended.
Post Reply