My youngest daughter and I disagree regarding the above plant. She said it was bought under the name barbadensis, so it must be correct. Internet pictures show a different plant altogether.
Just wondered if there is a grower out there who can put a picture of the real one on the forum.
It’s a big ask too. Thank you.
Aloe vera
Forum rules
For the discussion of topics related to the conservation, cultivation, propagation, exhibition & science of cacti & other succulents only.
Please respect all forum members opinions and if you can't make a civil reply, don't reply!
For the discussion of topics related to the conservation, cultivation, propagation, exhibition & science of cacti & other succulents only.
Please respect all forum members opinions and if you can't make a civil reply, don't reply!
-
- BCSS Member
- Posts: 2321
- https://www.behance.net/kuchnie-warszawa
- Joined: 13 Feb 2009
- Branch: SOUTH WALES
- Country: UK
- MatDz
- BCSS Member
- Posts: 2161
- Joined: 06 May 2020
- Branch: None
- Country: PL/GB
- Role within the BCSS: Member
Re: Aloe vera
Mat
-
- BCSS Member
- Posts: 897
- Joined: 20 Dec 2015
- Branch: BRADFORD
- Country: UK
- Role within the BCSS: Member
- Location: Birmingham, UK
- Contact:
Re: Aloe vera
A. barbadensis is a synonym of A. vera.
There is a wealth of nonsense talked on the internet about these plants. Advice to reproduce them from leaf cuttings, magical healing and dietary supplement properties, etc. A pedantic insistence on incorrect naming is the just one of many sins.
According to https://www.ipni.org/n/530015-1, a description of Aloe vera was published by Linnaeus in 1753, whereas Miller published A. barbadensis in 1768. Aloe vera therefore takes precedence.
There is a wealth of nonsense talked on the internet about these plants. Advice to reproduce them from leaf cuttings, magical healing and dietary supplement properties, etc. A pedantic insistence on incorrect naming is the just one of many sins.
According to https://www.ipni.org/n/530015-1, a description of Aloe vera was published by Linnaeus in 1753, whereas Miller published A. barbadensis in 1768. Aloe vera therefore takes precedence.
- habanerocat
- BCSS Member
- Posts: 1018
- Joined: 02 Jun 2012
- Branch: EDENBRIDGE
- Country: Mid-West Ireland
- Role within the BCSS: Member
- Location: Ireland
Re: Aloe vera
And it's native to Omar.
I always believed nobody knew where it came from......
I always believed nobody knew where it came from......
-
- BCSS Member
- Posts: 2321
- Joined: 13 Feb 2009
- Branch: SOUTH WALES
- Country: UK
Re: Aloe vera
A picture of a plant by a grower would suffice. Thanks
- Smel
- BCSS Member
- Posts: 375
- Joined: 21 May 2012
- Branch: LEICESTER
- Country: UK
- Role within the BCSS: Member
- Location: Leicester UK
- Contact:
Re: Aloe vera
Hi,
I thought I read that Aloe vera covers a range of plants all of which do have healing use, but perhaps mostly for burns (it worked for me with a solderig iron burn, but perhaps the thick cold sap was soothing and dried over the burn protecting it), but there again I may be wrong...
I thought I read that Aloe vera covers a range of plants all of which do have healing use, but perhaps mostly for burns (it worked for me with a solderig iron burn, but perhaps the thick cold sap was soothing and dried over the burn protecting it), but there again I may be wrong...
Open your mind, but not too much, your brain might fall out !!
BCSS Member Leicester.
Website: https://sites.google.com/view/melsaunders/home
I also like photography, electronics, model building......etc.
BCSS Member Leicester.
Website: https://sites.google.com/view/melsaunders/home
I also like photography, electronics, model building......etc.