I ran out recently so I had a quick look at the market to see what's available. There are several types and the values seemed to vary enormously, so I made up a little comparison table to make things clearer. Price information is from Amazon.
Cactus Fertiliser comparison
Forum rules
For the discussion of topics related to the conservation, cultivation, propagation, exhibition & science of cacti & other succulents only.
Please respect all forum members opinions and if you can't make a civil reply, don't reply!
For the discussion of topics related to the conservation, cultivation, propagation, exhibition & science of cacti & other succulents only.
Please respect all forum members opinions and if you can't make a civil reply, don't reply!
- gerald
- BCSS Member
- Posts: 645
- https://www.behance.net/kuchnie-warszawa
- Joined: 28 Jul 2010
- Branch: OXFORD
- Country: UK
- Role within the BCSS: Member
- Location: Watlington
- Contact:
- habanerocat
- BCSS Member
- Posts: 1016
- Joined: 02 Jun 2012
- Branch: EDENBRIDGE
- Country: Mid-West Ireland
- Role within the BCSS: Member
- Location: Ireland
Re: Cactus Fertiliser comparison
Are all those mixed at recommended strength? Making Chempak 8 more economical if mixed at half strength. If you know what I mean.
- juster
- BCSS Member
- Posts: 2125
- Joined: 17 Sep 2013
- Branch: CROYDON
- Country: UK
- Role within the BCSS: Branch Show
- Location: Surrey
Re: Cactus Fertiliser comparison
That's very useful Gerald, thanks. I generally use half strength Chempak 8, so definitely a good buy - I like the results too!
Croydon Branch member, growing mainly cacti and Echeverias
- gerald
- BCSS Member
- Posts: 645
- Joined: 28 Jul 2010
- Branch: OXFORD
- Country: UK
- Role within the BCSS: Member
- Location: Watlington
- Contact:
Re: Cactus Fertiliser comparison
Yes the table shows recommended (full) strength
So your Chempak 8 is even better value at 1/2 strength
The liquid feeds appear to be little more than water, given their very low NPK values and poor value for money!
So your Chempak 8 is even better value at 1/2 strength
The liquid feeds appear to be little more than water, given their very low NPK values and poor value for money!
- Phil_SK
- Moderator
- Posts: 5450
- Joined: 11 Jan 2007
- Branch: MACCLESFIELD & EAST CHESHIRE
- Country: UK
- Role within the BCSS: Forum Moderator
- Location: Stockport, UK
Re: Cactus Fertiliser comparison
Last column in £ not p?
Phil Crewe, BCSS 38143. Mostly S. American cacti, esp. Lobivia, Sulcorebutia and little Opuntia
- ralphrmartin
- BCSS Research Committee Chairman
- Posts: 6076
- Joined: 11 Jan 2007
- Branch: None
- Country: United Kingdom
- Role within the BCSS: Chairman - Research
- Location: Pwllheli
- Contact:
Re: Cactus Fertiliser comparison
You might want to add Ericaceous Miracle Grow to that. It's what I use, and is at least as economical - I add a 500g packet costing £4 to 2000L of water (perhaps more dilute than recommended, but still more than strong enough).
Ralph Martin
https://www.rrm.me.uk/Cacti/cacti.html
Members visiting the Llyn Peninsula are welcome to visit my collection.
Swaps and sales at https://www.rrm.me.uk/Cacti/forsale.php
My Field Number Database is at https://www.fieldnos.bcss.org.uk
https://www.rrm.me.uk/Cacti/cacti.html
Members visiting the Llyn Peninsula are welcome to visit my collection.
Swaps and sales at https://www.rrm.me.uk/Cacti/forsale.php
My Field Number Database is at https://www.fieldnos.bcss.org.uk
Re: Cactus Fertiliser comparison
In my very long experience, the best manufacturer is Solufeed. They are manufacturers of commercial feeds. They also supply in retail size packs. My plants made excellent progress with intermittent feeds of their balanced, and their high potassium feeds. Highly recommended - and UK manufactured.
www.solufeed.com
www.solufeed.com
Re: Cactus Fertiliser comparison
That is a particularly interesting table Gerald in being able to compare the NPK ratio that various manufacturers seem to regard as suitable for succulent plants. There really are big differences between them when one might have expected the proportions to be based on some sort of consensus, perhaps even on past research. I will stick with my Chempak 8.
Incidentally how does the nitrogen component compare in the products with respect to organic (urea) and inorganic (nitrate and ammonium ions) components? I would love to see some good data about how readily nitrogen can be made available from urea under our cactus cultivation conditions. In neat molar or pumice, it could be very little. I don't take any chances and using Chempak 8, the nitrogen is all inorganic and readily absorbed.
Incidentally how does the nitrogen component compare in the products with respect to organic (urea) and inorganic (nitrate and ammonium ions) components? I would love to see some good data about how readily nitrogen can be made available from urea under our cactus cultivation conditions. In neat molar or pumice, it could be very little. I don't take any chances and using Chempak 8, the nitrogen is all inorganic and readily absorbed.
- gerald
- BCSS Member
- Posts: 645
- Joined: 28 Jul 2010
- Branch: OXFORD
- Country: UK
- Role within the BCSS: Member
- Location: Watlington
- Contact:
Re: Cactus Fertiliser comparison
I'm inclined to agree with you, I use their products to grow my giant pumpkin, and I got 2nd place in the UK last yearPeter wrote: ↑Tue Jul 07, 2020 8:00 pm In my very long experience, the best manufacturer is Solufeed. They are manufacturers of commercial feeds. They also supply in retail size packs. My plants made excellent progress with intermittent feeds of their balanced, and their high potassium feeds. Highly recommended - and UK manufactured.
www.solufeed.com
Which one is it specifically that you use for your cacti?