Worst flower to photograph?

For the discussion of topics related to the conservation, cultivation, propagation and exhibition of cacti & other succulents.
Forum rules
For the discussion of topics related to the conservation, cultivation, propagation, exhibition & science of cacti & other succulents only.

Please respect all forum members opinions and if you can't make a civil reply, don't reply!
User avatar
DaveW
BCSS Member
Posts: 8175
https://www.behance.net/kuchnie-warszawa
Joined: 08 Jul 2007
Branch: NOTTINGHAM
Country: UK
Role within the BCSS: Branch President
Location: Nottingham

Worst flower to photograph?

Post by DaveW »

What is your worst flower to photograph to try and get the colours right. Mine is Aylostera rosalbiflora with white but slightly flushed pink petals?

R.-rosealbiflora.jpg
rosalbiflora.jpg

I am often being shown numerous photo's on smartphones of collectors plants but so few seem to post them on Forums like this? Yet have no reservations of posting on Social Media. Todays smartphones are more than adequate for posting on the web so why not?
Last edited by DaveW on Tue Mar 28, 2023 3:43 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Nottingham Branch BCSS. Joined the then NCSS in 1961, Membership number 11944. Cactus only collection.
User avatar
greatnorthernexotic
BCSS Member
Posts: 136
Joined: 06 Dec 2022
Branch: LEEDS
Country: United Kingdom
Role within the BCSS: Member

Re: Worst flower to photograph?

Post by greatnorthernexotic »

My uebelmannia pectinifera has spectacularly unspectacular flowers IMHO. Difficult to make look interesting in a photograph.
PXL_20230112_154720838.jpg
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
BCSS #54601 (LEEDS BRANCH)
youtube.com/@greatnorthernexotic / instagram.com/greatnorthernexotic
In the greenhouse: ariocarpus, astrophytum, aztekium, copiapoa, lophophora...
In the outdoor arid bed: hardy agave, aloe, dasylirion, hesperaloe, opuntia, yucca...
User avatar
Chris L
BCSS Branch Websites Co-ordinator
Posts: 2621
Joined: 11 Oct 2009
Branch: MANCHESTER
Country: England
Role within the BCSS: Branch Websites Co-ordinator
Location: Lancashire, England
Contact:

Re: Worst flower to photograph?

Post by Chris L »

One that flowered when you were out for the day? :???:

Seriously, reds are the worst for me.
Joined 1991
Lamb's Reference Plate Index http://www.cactus-corner.co.uk/referenc ... -guide.htm
FREE on Kindle Unlimited:
Anglesey Circular Walk https://amzn.to/34i18qF
Lytham-Arnside Walk https://amzn.to/3fpQPGf
My Redbubble Shop https://www.redbubble.com/people/cactuschris/shop
User avatar
DaveW
BCSS Member
Posts: 8175
Joined: 08 Jul 2007
Branch: NOTTINGHAM
Country: UK
Role within the BCSS: Branch President
Location: Nottingham

Re: Worst flower to photograph?

Post by DaveW »

Yes the digital camera sensor does not always see colours as we do having the plant in front of us, but then neither did film.

I can find little about "rosalbiflora" on the Web other than it was a Ritter name.

https://www.rebutia.org.uk/aylostera-amblypetala/

The only picture I can find on the Web seems to be a much pinker coloured clone than mine.

https://garden.org/plants/photo/632738/
Nottingham Branch BCSS. Joined the then NCSS in 1961, Membership number 11944. Cactus only collection.
User avatar
el48tel
BCSS Member
Posts: 5369
Joined: 04 Aug 2018
Branch: LEEDS
Country: UK
Role within the BCSS: Member
Location: Leeds

Re: Worst flower to photograph?

Post by el48tel »

Sorry guys .... but there is a simple solution. Take a piece of black card out with you when you photograph ... that is then your "standard colour" ..... tell your camera or processing app that is neutral .... and apply those settings to all photos taken on that day at that time in that place.
OR
set the colour temperature in your camera settings
OR
use a standard colour temperature card or dongle
Endeavouring to grow Aylostera, Echinocereus, Echinopsis, Gymnocalycium, Matucana, Rebutia, and Sulcorebutia. Fallen out of love with Lithops and aggravated by Aeoniums.
Currently being wooed by Haworthia, attempting hybridisation, and enticed by Mesembs.
Herts Mike
BCSS Member
Posts: 4335
Joined: 20 Sep 2007
Branch: LEA VALLEY
Country: Uk

Re: Worst flower to photograph?

Post by Herts Mike »

In terms of position Huernia pendula is almost impossible.
SimonT
Registered Guest
Posts: 301
Joined: 28 Dec 2020
Branch: None
Country: uk
Role within the BCSS: Member

Re: Worst flower to photograph?

Post by SimonT »

This photo seems quite a similar pink- you can just see the pink flush?

https://www.adblps-graines-cactus.com/g ... f-1557.jpg

Reds are the worst colours to photograph for me although really bright pink can also be quite tricky.
User avatar
DaveW
BCSS Member
Posts: 8175
Joined: 08 Jul 2007
Branch: NOTTINGHAM
Country: UK
Role within the BCSS: Branch President
Location: Nottingham

Re: Worst flower to photograph?

Post by DaveW »

As I understand it you can use a black card to set that tone in photo processing (white and grey ones the same), but for setting exposure at the camera traditionally it was a Kodak 18% grey card. This was supposed to be what all camera meters integrated to (not strictly true, but near enough). Getting the camera exposure correct or black in processing will not always render all colours correctly but is a good starting point since sensors (and film in the past) don't see all colours the same as the human eye.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gray_card ... %20%5B1%5D

https://photo.stackexchange.com/questio ... white-card

As said, sensor and eye do not see the same so photo processing, either in camera or afterwards, is needed to produce an image something like our eyes see.

https://medium.com/hd-pro/human-vision- ... db3b19cc7f
Nottingham Branch BCSS. Joined the then NCSS in 1961, Membership number 11944. Cactus only collection.
User avatar
el48tel
BCSS Member
Posts: 5369
Joined: 04 Aug 2018
Branch: LEEDS
Country: UK
Role within the BCSS: Member
Location: Leeds

Re: Worst flower to photograph?

Post by el48tel »

DaveW wrote: Tue Mar 28, 2023 8:17 pm As I understand it you can use a black card to set that tone in photo processing (white and grey ones the same), but for setting exposure at the camera traditionally it was a Kodak 18% grey card. This was supposed to be what all camera meters integrated to (not strictly true, but near enough). Getting the camera exposure correct or black in processing will not always render all colours correctly but is a good starting point since sensors (and film in the past) don't see all colours the same as the human eye.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gray_card ... %20%5B1%5D

https://photo.stackexchange.com/questio ... white-card

As said, sensor and eye do not see the same so photo processing, either in camera or afterwards, is needed to produce an image something like our eyes see.

https://medium.com/hd-pro/human-vision- ... db3b19cc7f
Most processing apps baulk at white cards. Grey .... unless an 18% Kodak or similar .... can be anything but grey. Black would seem to be the ones used to set colour print standards, certainly in the pro digital art software I use. There are colour standardisation matrix packs available from several manufacturers. You photograph it. You load the image into your process app. The difference is evaluated and you calibrate your images from it. Or you use a standard grey cube. I have both. They both have advantages and disadvantages.
Endeavouring to grow Aylostera, Echinocereus, Echinopsis, Gymnocalycium, Matucana, Rebutia, and Sulcorebutia. Fallen out of love with Lithops and aggravated by Aeoniums.
Currently being wooed by Haworthia, attempting hybridisation, and enticed by Mesembs.
User avatar
rodsmith
BCSS Member
Posts: 3194
Joined: 17 Feb 2011
Branch: STOKE-ON-TRENT
Country: UK
Location: Staffordshire, UK

Re: Worst flower to photograph?

Post by rodsmith »

I don't normally use a camera phone for photographs, preferring a didital camera, and I find that underexposing a shot by one third or two thirds of a stop - sometimes even a whole stop - emphasises contrast and colour in flower photos.
Rod Smith

Growing a mixed collection of cacti & other succulents; mainly smaller species with a current emphasis on lithops & conophytum.
Post Reply