Plant Passport question

For the discussion of topics related to the conservation, cultivation, propagation and exhibition of cacti & other succulents.
Forum rules
For the discussion of topics related to the conservation, cultivation, propagation, exhibition & science of cacti & other succulents only.

Please respect all forum members opinions and if you can't make a civil reply, don't reply!
Post Reply
MikeDom
BCSS Member
Posts: 508
https://www.behance.net/kuchnie-warszawa
Joined: 08 Jun 2018
Branch: GLOUCESTER
Country: England
Role within the BCSS: Member
Location: King Cod's Land

Plant Passport question

Post by MikeDom »

I came across these plants with a Plant Passport with the species identified as Aloe polyphylla. It doesn't look like any A. polyphylla I've got, so is this wrongly named or a cultivar perhaps?

IMG_5934.jpg

IMG_5933.jpg
Mike

BCSS member 39216

Active grower of caudiciform succulents and mesembs. I don't really grow cacti (very often).
User avatar
Diane
BCSS Member
Posts: 5577
Joined: 15 Jun 2007
Branch: None
Country: UK
Role within the BCSS: Member

Re: Plant Passport question

Post by Diane »

Definitely not polyphylla! Which just goes to show that plant passports are a waste of time, I think. ( It looks like a hybrid, but no idea which).
Diane - member of Kingston branch

Growing cacti - balm to the soul!
Herts Mike
BCSS Member
Posts: 4315
Joined: 20 Sep 2007
Branch: LEA VALLEY
Country: Uk

Re: Plant Passport question

Post by Herts Mike »

Quite attractive though.
David Neville
BCSS Zone Rep
Posts: 156
Joined: 11 Jan 2007
Branch: SOUTHAMPTON
Country: UK
Role within the BCSS: Branch Secretary

Re: Plant Passport question

Post by David Neville »

The plant in the photograph is the widespread and freely clustering hybrid between Aloe descoingsii and A. haworthioides. I believe that it was originally produced by John Bleck in the USA. Nowadays it is sometimes seen labelled as 'Pepe', but I have no idea who coined that name, or when it was applied. In years gone by it was never known in the UK with that cultivar name. It is a vigorous, fast growing plant, but as the individual rosettes are usually no more than 5 or 6cm diameter, it is certainly not unmanageable. Each of the parent species are much more worthy of a place in a collection than this considerably easier and faster growing hybrid.
David Neville
Secretary of Southampton & District Branch. BCSS member since 1977.
edds
BCSS Member
Posts: 2871
Joined: 09 Dec 2019
Branch: None
Country: United Kingdom
Role within the BCSS: Member

Re: Plant Passport question

Post by edds »

They certainly do seem to be turning out to be the bureaucratic nonsense a number predicted they would be! What a waste of time and money! Be much better if any plant sold simply had to have the grower's name attached in some way!
Ed

BCSS member 53038
User avatar
MatDz
BCSS Member
Posts: 2134
Joined: 06 May 2020
Branch: None
Country: PL/GB
Role within the BCSS: Member

Re: Plant Passport question

Post by MatDz »

edds wrote: Sun Apr 11, 2021 5:12 pm They certainly do seem to be turning out to be the bureaucratic nonsense a number predicted they would be! What a waste of time and money! Be much better if any plant sold simply had to have the grower's name attached in some way!
Isn't that what the B-D fields are supposed to tell? I understand the passport's role is to aid in tracking the plant's route to the market, not the taxa really (which would be nice, but for that we have the small, specialist nurseries).
Mat
edds
BCSS Member
Posts: 2871
Joined: 09 Dec 2019
Branch: None
Country: United Kingdom
Role within the BCSS: Member

Re: Plant Passport question

Post by edds »

Yeah it is but why not just put the name and address there so it can be traced if there is a problem rather than making it some reference code that only DEFRA or whoever it is inspecting then knows?
Ed

BCSS member 53038
User avatar
MatDz
BCSS Member
Posts: 2134
Joined: 06 May 2020
Branch: None
Country: PL/GB
Role within the BCSS: Member

Re: Plant Passport question

Post by MatDz »

edds wrote: Sun Apr 11, 2021 9:39 pm Yeah it is but why not just put the name and address there so it can be traced if there is a problem rather than making it some reference code that only DEFRA or whoever it is inspecting then knows?
You just answered your own question, no business wants to be bothered by the customer 5 steps down the line, also not many intermediary suppliers want to give away their own suppliers (sometimes labels make this obvious of course).
Mat
Post Reply