Copiapoa hypogea

For the discussion of topics related to the conservation, cultivation, propagation and exhibition of cacti & other succulents.
Forum rules
For the discussion of topics related to the conservation, cultivation, propagation, exhibition & science of cacti & other succulents only.

Please respect all forum members opinions and if you can't make a civil reply, don't reply!
Post Reply
uzbeck
BCSS Member
Posts: 100
https://www.behance.net/kuchnie-warszawa
Joined: 06 Oct 2012
Branch: CLACTON-on-SEA
Country: uk
Role within the BCSS: Member
Location: North Wales

Copiapoa hypogea

Post by uzbeck »

In flower today.
Copiapoa hypogea FK444
Copiapoa hypogea FK444
User avatar
juster
BCSS Member
Posts: 2124
Joined: 17 Sep 2013
Branch: CROYDON
Country: UK
Role within the BCSS: Branch Show
Location: Surrey

Re: Copiapoa hypogea

Post by juster »

That’s a very pretty flower (tu)
Croydon Branch member, growing mainly cacti and Echeverias
Cidermanrolls
BCSS Member
Posts: 603
Joined: 21 Nov 2016
Branch: LINCOLN
Country: England
Role within the BCSS: Member

Re: Copiapoa hypogea

Post by Cidermanrolls »

Is it just me? That is certainly a pretty flower, but the spines are nothing like any Copiapoa hypogaea I’ve seen before.
User avatar
rodsmith
BCSS Member
Posts: 3194
Joined: 17 Feb 2011
Branch: STOKE-ON-TRENT
Country: UK
Location: Staffordshire, UK

Re: Copiapoa hypogea

Post by rodsmith »

Cidermanrolls wrote: Sat Jun 26, 2021 8:59 pm Is it just me? That is certainly a pretty flower, but the spines are nothing like any Copiapoa hypogaea I’ve seen before.
I agree. C. hypogea spines are tiny, almost non-existent.
Rod Smith

Growing a mixed collection of cacti & other succulents; mainly smaller species with a current emphasis on lithops & conophytum.
uzbeck
BCSS Member
Posts: 100
Joined: 06 Oct 2012
Branch: CLACTON-on-SEA
Country: uk
Role within the BCSS: Member
Location: North Wales

Re: Copiapoa hypogea

Post by uzbeck »

Thanks for your comments Rod and Cidermanrolls. I originally acquired this plant from the Copiapoa National Collection at Chester Zoo labelled Copiapoa hypogaea FK444. An admittedly cursory review, firstly from Ralph Martins Field Number database showed FK444 to be a collection by Fred Katterman which he called C. mollicula. Graham Charles in his book 'Copiapoa' merely noted that this was now C. hypogaea. Consequently I left the label name as it was.

Following your comments I did a little more digging. There is on the forum a 2009 posting showing a C. mollicula looking identical to my plant. viewtopic.php?t=151113
There is also a very detailed explanation of the mollicula/hypogaea name on the CactiGuide forum at http://cactiguide.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=5013

Whilst it has been called mollicula or montana or hypogaea the name in current application seems to be mollicula. This is accepted by Kew Plants of the World Online, in the Larridon et al paper 'An integrative approach to understanding the evolution and diversity of Copiapoa (Cactaceae), a threatened endemic Chilean genus from the Atacama desert' and consequently by Joel Lode in his Taxonomy of the Cactaceae', others however show it to be a synonym of C. montana. It is all a matter of opinion but I tend to go with Lode whilst maintaining notes of previous names. In either event it looks like a change of my label is called for.
User avatar
rodsmith
BCSS Member
Posts: 3194
Joined: 17 Feb 2011
Branch: STOKE-ON-TRENT
Country: UK
Location: Staffordshire, UK

Re: Copiapoa hypogea

Post by rodsmith »

Names seem to be changing all the time in the cactus world. This was the plant I had recorded as C. montana flowering in 2015:
Copiapoa montana
Copiapoa montana
And this is my C. hypogaea flowering in July 2019.
Copiapos hypogaea
Copiapos hypogaea
Rod Smith

Growing a mixed collection of cacti & other succulents; mainly smaller species with a current emphasis on lithops & conophytum.
Post Reply