carnegieae gigantea  Solved

For the discussion of topics related to the conservation, cultivation, propagation and exhibition of cacti & other succulents.
Forum rules
For the discussion of topics related to the conservation, cultivation, propagation, exhibition & science of cacti & other succulents only.

Please respect all forum members opinions and if you can't make a civil reply, don't reply!
Guest
https://www.behance.net/kuchnie-warszawa

carnegieae gigantea

Post by Guest »

Anybody know the growth rate of these from seed?

Mike.
User avatar
iann
BCSS Member
Posts: 14565
Joined: 11 Jan 2007
Branch: MACCLESFIELD & EAST CHESHIRE
Country: UK
Role within the BCSS: Member

Re: carnegieae gigantea

Post by iann »

Slow, at least compared to their ultimate size. Perhaps you'd consider them fast compared to a miniature Mammillaria or Ariocarpus ;)
Cheshire, UK
Guest

Re: carnegieae gigantea

Post by Guest »

I know they are slow Ian but somebody has asked me height and time e.g. 2 foot in 20 years?
User avatar
Paul in Essex
BCSS Member
Posts: 2099
Joined: 11 Jan 2007
Branch: SOUTHEND-ON-SEA
Country: England
Role within the BCSS: Member
Location: North Thames Delta
Contact:

Re: carnegieae gigantea

Post by Paul in Essex »

I had a great time visiting some cactus and succlent collection in Holland this weekend. In one of them the guy had planted some specimens into a border in his glasshouse, inclduing two saguaro. Both were plants he had grown from seed 30 years ago - One was a double plant and around 2ft tall, the other was a monster single about 8ft tall. Both from the same batch of seed, given identical growing conditions. Weird!

I think the big one was an aberration, though. I was also fortunate to make a lightening trip to Arizona earlier this year and, whilst there, was speaking to a guy who been growing one in his garden since moving there 25 years earlier. In that time it had grown 3ft.
www.oasisdesigns.co.uk

Exotic garden design.
User avatar
iann
BCSS Member
Posts: 14565
Joined: 11 Jan 2007
Branch: MACCLESFIELD & EAST CHESHIRE
Country: UK
Role within the BCSS: Member

Re: carnegieae gigantea  Solved

Post by iann »

An inch or year is considered reasonable growth, although I'm sure you could do better in ideal conditions.
Cheshire, UK
Guest

Re: carnegieae gigantea

Post by Guest »

Thanks Paul. Just what I needed to know.


Mike.
Vic
Registered Guest
Posts: 5123
Joined: 11 Jan 2007
Branch: BRADFORD
Country: UK
Role within the BCSS: Seed Purchaser
Location: Birmingham UK

Re: carnegieae gigantea

Post by Vic »

Yes slow - it's all going to depend on growing conditions - how much fertiliser/heat/exposure to sun/frequency of potting on etc.. You may be lucky and get 2ft in 20 years probably more chance of that if it's grown in the ground/raised bed in a ghouse with it's own root run. They're not particularly fast growing either in habitat where they get a much longer growing period/season than we do here in the UK, typically only branching around 70 years old.
Image
Guest

Re: carnegieae gigantea

Post by Guest »

Glad I'm not growing it then. Don't know why this person is so obsessed with it. Still, each to his own.

Mike.
Guest

Re: carnegieae gigantea

Post by Guest »

Mike,

Slow, they do better in an open bed, if they have a free root run then the growth is about twice that in pots once they become established.
I would guess at a foot in 15-20 years in a pot.
User avatar
Peter
BCSS Member
Posts: 2646
Joined: 22 Mar 2007
Branch: None
Country: UK
Location: Cornwall

Re: carnegieae gigantea

Post by Peter »

I recently bought one from Southfields, 8" tall and a really spikey and chunky plant. Cost ?4.50 - a bargain for a plant that must be a good few years old.
Post Reply