Anybody know the growth rate of these from seed?
Mike.
carnegieae gigantea Solved
Forum rules
For the discussion of topics related to the conservation, cultivation, propagation, exhibition & science of cacti & other succulents only.
Please respect all forum members opinions and if you can't make a civil reply, don't reply!
For the discussion of topics related to the conservation, cultivation, propagation, exhibition & science of cacti & other succulents only.
Please respect all forum members opinions and if you can't make a civil reply, don't reply!
- iann
- BCSS Member
- Posts: 14565
- Joined: 11 Jan 2007
- Branch: MACCLESFIELD & EAST CHESHIRE
- Country: UK
- Role within the BCSS: Member
Re: carnegieae gigantea
Slow, at least compared to their ultimate size. Perhaps you'd consider them fast compared to a miniature Mammillaria or Ariocarpus
Cheshire, UK
Re: carnegieae gigantea
I know they are slow Ian but somebody has asked me height and time e.g. 2 foot in 20 years?
- Paul in Essex
- BCSS Member
- Posts: 2099
- Joined: 11 Jan 2007
- Branch: SOUTHEND-ON-SEA
- Country: England
- Role within the BCSS: Member
- Location: North Thames Delta
- Contact:
Re: carnegieae gigantea
I had a great time visiting some cactus and succlent collection in Holland this weekend. In one of them the guy had planted some specimens into a border in his glasshouse, inclduing two saguaro. Both were plants he had grown from seed 30 years ago - One was a double plant and around 2ft tall, the other was a monster single about 8ft tall. Both from the same batch of seed, given identical growing conditions. Weird!
I think the big one was an aberration, though. I was also fortunate to make a lightening trip to Arizona earlier this year and, whilst there, was speaking to a guy who been growing one in his garden since moving there 25 years earlier. In that time it had grown 3ft.
I think the big one was an aberration, though. I was also fortunate to make a lightening trip to Arizona earlier this year and, whilst there, was speaking to a guy who been growing one in his garden since moving there 25 years earlier. In that time it had grown 3ft.
- iann
- BCSS Member
- Posts: 14565
- Joined: 11 Jan 2007
- Branch: MACCLESFIELD & EAST CHESHIRE
- Country: UK
- Role within the BCSS: Member
Re: carnegieae gigantea Solved
An inch or year is considered reasonable growth, although I'm sure you could do better in ideal conditions.
Cheshire, UK
Re: carnegieae gigantea
Thanks Paul. Just what I needed to know.
Mike.
Mike.
-
- Registered Guest
- Posts: 5123
- Joined: 11 Jan 2007
- Branch: BRADFORD
- Country: UK
- Role within the BCSS: Seed Purchaser
- Location: Birmingham UK
Re: carnegieae gigantea
Yes slow - it's all going to depend on growing conditions - how much fertiliser/heat/exposure to sun/frequency of potting on etc.. You may be lucky and get 2ft in 20 years probably more chance of that if it's grown in the ground/raised bed in a ghouse with it's own root run. They're not particularly fast growing either in habitat where they get a much longer growing period/season than we do here in the UK, typically only branching around 70 years old.
Re: carnegieae gigantea
Glad I'm not growing it then. Don't know why this person is so obsessed with it. Still, each to his own.
Mike.
Mike.
Re: carnegieae gigantea
Mike,
Slow, they do better in an open bed, if they have a free root run then the growth is about twice that in pots once they become established.
I would guess at a foot in 15-20 years in a pot.
Slow, they do better in an open bed, if they have a free root run then the growth is about twice that in pots once they become established.
I would guess at a foot in 15-20 years in a pot.
Re: carnegieae gigantea
I recently bought one from Southfields, 8" tall and a really spikey and chunky plant. Cost ?4.50 - a bargain for a plant that must be a good few years old.